Neptune Street

Dedicated area to show the community your model railway projects.
Carl L
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:05 pm
Location: East Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#391

Post by Carl L »

It’s LCut. Slowly, slowly, a lot of dry runs, but a bit more progress this evening.

Image
Carl L
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:05 pm
Location: East Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#392

Post by Carl L »

Some progress; the footbridge is done, not sure about smoke deflectors under the walkway, it doesn’t look like Hull footbridges had any. Spray booth next, well a very large cardboard box :lol: The white card is where the signal box will sit.

Image
Carl L
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:05 pm
Location: East Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#393

Post by Carl L »

This week’s progress;

The footbridge is ready for trainspotters, crisp packets and empty cans. :D

Image

The gates have had the mesh fitted, not the easiest to cut, gently does it :roll:

Image
User avatar
Rog (RJ)
Posts: 635
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:49 pm
Location: South Nottingham
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#394

Post by Rog (RJ) »

Very nice.
User avatar
Steve M
Posts: 3887
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:29 pm
Location: Rochester, Kent
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#395

Post by Steve M »

I particularly like those crossing gates. Excellent modelling.
"Not very stable, but incredibly versatile." ;)
Carl L
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:05 pm
Location: East Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#396

Post by Carl L »

Thank you both.
User avatar
bulleidboy
Posts: 2494
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:30 pm
Location: Basingstoke, Hants
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#397

Post by bulleidboy »

Great work. Footbridge is very good, did you decide against the smoke deflectors? Look forward to seeing the crossing gates in position.
Carl L
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:05 pm
Location: East Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#398

Post by Carl L »

I suppose the jury is still out on the smoke deflectors; I’ve not tried them, but being at an angle they will sit awkwardly across the bracing brackets (if that’s what they’re called) and not sure what they will look like. I’m sort of hanging on the fact that the crossing in Hull idea is based on, didn’t have any. But then I might have a play and try them :lol:

The crossing gates will be fixed, I really can’t be bothered with all the hassle of trying to motorise them and besides as the track level drops I think there will to large gaps under the gates, not exactly prototypical.
Mountain Goat
Posts: 1698
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 12:57 pm
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#399

Post by Mountain Goat »

Looks very much like a footbridge still seen in some places on the railway network. These bridges were also found in covered form. Example, even though they do not look it, the one at Llanelli is a covered version of these and I think (If I recall) there is a covered version at Bridgend. The footbridge at Pembrey & Burry Port station (Which has had a major restoration twice in its life) has never been covered. It has its stairways going off where one is going the different direction to the other. The one at Haverfordwest once was covered, but a Station Supervisor saw a fault with its roof and reported it around 30 years ago and its roof was completely removed for safety reasons, so I assume rust had got to its roof supports? It now looks like an ordinary uncovered footbridge. Why I love to know if any of the other uncovered type ever had roofs to them in the past.
Budget modelling in 0-16.5...
Carl L
Posts: 468
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2018 6:05 pm
Location: East Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Neptune Street

#400

Post by Carl L »

MG,

Interesting, I’ve just had a look at images of the three main crossings in Hull, in the stream era, footbridges at both Hessle Road and Anlaby Road had metal loops over the top and one at Holderness Road was covered over, more mesh than a roof.

Up until last year the footbridge at Beverley railway station had a full covered wooden structure, but despite being listed (I believe) it has been replaced with an open structure :cry:
Post Reply